Worried about DUI charges? Here’s how a legal counselor can help….

Being arrested for a DUI doesn’t mean you will be convicted. Experienced DUI lawyers in Los Angeles, CA have always proved that there are several defenses that work and are happy to share some of the most successful.

Driving pattern cannot confirm DUI

One of the biggest defenses is the so called ‘driving pattern’ that prosecutors often focus on. The arresting officer is made to testify that your driving pattern was similar to someone who was behind the wheel under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

This is true. There are some bad drivers out there. In fact, according to the movie Gone in 60 Seconds, some female drivers receive a license just for crying. Donny Astricky (Chi McBride) knows all about this! That driver should not have been given a license. Well, she would have figured that out on her own when she crashed on the way home from the DMV office which she most likely would have done.

Furthermore, this includes speeding and driving erratically within and outside your respective lane. However, California DUI attorneys often challenge this evidence and argue that driving patterns cannot always be a reliable predictor of DUI.

The Lakers lose all the time but DUI lawyers in Los Angeles, CA  do not!

Your legal counselor will also stress the fact that most traffic violations are caused by people who are not driving inebriated. It could just be that reaching over to change a CD, flipping through the songs, grabbing a bottle of water, and so on may have caused you to drift into another lane, which could be the case with any sober person.

If you need legal help in any DUI regard, press right here DUI-USAttorneys.com.

Physical appearance cannot indicate intoxication

For the most part, the police have a list of signs of intoxication in their arrest form. This includes red eyes, flushed face, slurry speech, and unsteady gait, which are noted as your physical appearance. The officer will testify using these signs and symptoms but a skilled legal pro will do what it takes to attack each one of these symptoms. A cold, allergy, irritation in the eyes, fatigue, and so on can all cause red eyes, which don’t necessarily prove you were driving intoxicated.  

Field sobriety tests are inaccurate

Often times, the prosecution relies heavily on field sobriety tests and is likely to testify that you performed poorly during these tests and is therefore guilty of drunk driving.

Your legal counselor may counter this by explaining how fatigue, nerves, and even clothing to an extent can affect your balance and coordination. Depending on the circumstances, your legal representative may also challenge the reliability of these tests since the officer conducting the test may not have proper training and experience or the test conditions may not have been ideal.

Non-compliance with Title 17 Regulations

Los Angeles, CA DUI lawyers reiterate that it is also possible that the arresting officer did not comply with the state’s Title 17 regulations on how blood and breath tests should be conducted. The person conducting the blood and breath tests must have proper training and administer the test properly. It is also mandatory to conduct a 15-minute observation period, which could also be challenged by your legal pro.  

If any of the Title 17 regulations are not adhered to, it is very likely like your blood test results are inaccurate. Often, the preservative used to collect the blood sample may have expired or the arresting officer may have failed to store the sample properly. A California DUI lawyer will be able to challenge the DUI test results and convince the jury that your BAC was possibly not what the tests indicate.

Contact USAttorneys.com – we know how to help people out. We may call you back that same day as well.